Sunday, February 08, 2009

Fördomsfylld artikel i AB av fördomsfulla invandrare mfl.

Aftonbladet publicerar en artikel av invandrartidningen Gringo's medarbetare.

Gringo menar att invandringspolitiken i Danmark är rasistisk. Skribenterna förklarar inte hur den skulle vara rasistisk, artikeln talar inte med ett enda ord om vilken invandringspolitik man har i Danmark. Istället försöker artikeln bara ytligt förmedla ungefär att alla danskar är rasister och skribenterna hoppas att Sverige inte blir likt Danmark.

I inledningen i artikeln skriver de att "En del säger att den danska så kallade invandrardebatten är mer öppen än den svenska. Att det finns saker man i Sverige ”inte får säga”." Men sedan byter man ämne och talar om "den utbredda rasismen" i Danmark. De utvecklar inte hur debatten skiljer sig i Sverige och Danmark men mot slutet av artikeln skriver de att debatten i Danmark inte är öppen men den känns "snarare extremt låst".

Det är välkänt att man i Sverige inte ens har en debatt om invandring men debatten är ganska öppen i Danmark. Gringo som givetvis har ett egenintresse att försvara att invandring tillåts, försöker vinkla sanningen enbart för att de inte gillar den danska öppna debatten och deras mer begränsade invandring.

Gringo försöker smutskasta Danskar som är emot för stor invandring och de som talar ut om sanningar som Gringo inte tycker om. En fördom som Gringo vill förmedla ar att muslimska invandrare inte begår mer brott än allmänheten. Statistik talar tydligt om en kraftig överepresentation bland muslimska invandrare i många brottskategorier. Att öppet säga det som den danska rektorn säger kallar Gringo for "verbal attack". Gringo ogillar dessutom rektorns teori att muslimska unga hatar Danmark, det kallar Gringo for absurt. Det är inte absurt eftersom det är lätt att få det intrycket om man studerar vad de gör.

Aftonbladet har i samband med artikeln en poll med frågan "är Danmarks invandringspolitik avskräckande?" utan att man förklarar hur Danmarks invandringpolitk ser ut. Jag skulle förmodligen svara JA men den begränsade kännedom jag har om deras politik. Danmarks invandringspolitik är för mig avskräckande eftersom jag antar att den är alldeles för stor och har lett till mycket stora sociala problem i Danmark.

Om man som godsinnad och lättlurad medborgare tror pa artikeln, vilket man inte kan göra, så borde svaret på frågan bli, JA eftersom vi borde tycka att en rasistisk politik är avskräckande. Artikeln har ju misslyckats med sitt försök att visa en rasistisk politk, man har inte redovisat någon politik alls. Men svaret på frågan blev att 72 % tycker NEJ, deras politik är inte avskräckande. Det resultatet antyder inte att de som svarar är rasister, snarare att läsarna genomskådat vad artikeln försöker göra. Artikelskivarna är därmed genomskådade och icke trovärdiga vilket är enkelt att se. En liten poll om artikelns trovärdighet borde klara upp det. 

Aftonbladet glömde nämna att den tredje artikelskrivaren även han arbetar for Gringo, han presenterades bara som journalist i AB artikeln. 

Det jag nyss skrev om i artikeln nedan var att om en tidning ska sätta ut en poll så måste den åtföljas av propaganda. Dvs om man vill lura läsarna, och det är just det som AB's artikel är ett exempel på. De kommer förmodligen aldrig publicera en rättelse om den Danska invandringspolitiken och ha en poll i samband med det. Det ligger inte i journalisternas natur att sprida sanningar och avslöja fördomar, det är bloggarnas uppgift. AB


World traveller said...


Prime Minister John Howard - Australia

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia , as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.

Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques. Quote:

'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.'

'This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom'

'We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, Learn the language!'

'Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.'

'We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.'

'This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.'

'If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.'

Maybe if we circulate this amongst ourselves, Swedish citizens will find the backbone to start speaking and voicing
the same truths.

If you agree please SEND THIS ON

World traveller said...


This was written by a Canadian woman, but oh how it also applies to the U..S. , U.K. and Australia


Here is a woman who should run for Prime Minister!

Written by a housewife in New Brunswick, to her local newspaper. This is one ticked off lady. ..........................................................................................

'Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001 and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from the nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania ?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency.

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11..

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan .

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques and behind women and children.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blows themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

I'll care when the Canadian media stops pretending that their freedom of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a CANADIAN soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:

I don't care.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and 'fed special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it,

I don't care!!

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behavior!

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country! And may I add:

'Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Soldiers don't have that problem.'

I have another quote that I would like to add, AND.......I hope you forward all this.

One last thought for the day:

Only five defining forces have ever offered to die for you:

1. Jesus Christ

2. The Canadian Soldier.

3. The British Soldier..

4. The US Soldier, and

5. The Australian Soldier

One died for your soul, the other 4 for your freedom.



World traveller said...


Michael Richards Court Speech
Michael Richards is better known as Kramer from tv's Seinfeld series.
This was his defence speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act.

I'm proud To Be White
Someone finally said it.
How many are actually paying attention to this ?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans,
Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.
And then there are just Americans.
You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.
You Call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,'
'Whitey,' 'Caveman' ... and that's OK.

But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head,
Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner , Gook, or Chink ..
You call me a racist.
You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you,
so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live ?
You have the United Negro College Fund.
You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month.
You have Cesar Chavez Day.
You have Yom Hashoah.
You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP.
You have BET.
If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we'd be racists.
If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
If we had White History Month , we'd be racists.
If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance'
OUR lives we'd be racists.
We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that ?

A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant,
but any color can be in the Miss America pageant. If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships you know we'd be racists. There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US . Yet if there were 'White colleges' THAT would be a racist college.

In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights,
you would call us racists. You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it.
But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.

You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us.
But , when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or
beats up a black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a
threat to society, you call him a racist.
I am proud.
But you call me a racist.
Why is it that only whites can be racists ?

There is nothing improper about this e-mail.

Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Ett klart fall av hets mot danskar.